Best Black Friday Gaming Monitor Deals

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This post may contain affiliate links at no extra cost to you.

The best Black Friday gaming monitor deal for most shoppers is the Samsung 32″ Odyssey (G55C) — a 32-inch QHD curved panel at 165 Hz with 1000R curvature, HDR10 and AMD FreeSync Premium, sitting in the mid-range price tier. It suits a desktop PC with a mid-range or better graphics card, a desk at least 70 cm deep, and a mix of single-player and competitive play. If budget is the binding constraint, the Dell 24 240Hz (SE2426HG) is the best cheap pick: a 23.8-inch 1080p IPS panel at 240 Hz that buys genuine esports-grade motion for the least money. If image quality outranks price, the Samsung 27″ Odyssey OLED G6 (G61SH) is the premium answer, pairing QD-OLED contrast with OLED-class response times. Everything below is sorted by resolution, refresh rate, adaptive sync, HDR class, size and gaming platform, so you can match a discount to the setup you actually own rather than to the largest percentage off.

Top 3 Picks

Best Overall: Samsung 32″ Odyssey (G55C)

The G55C hits the sweet spot of size, resolution and refresh rate that most gamers land on after a few upgrades: 32 inches, QHD, 165 Hz, a 1000R curve and FreeSync Premium with low framerate compensation. It is fast enough for ranked shooters, large enough for a console and immersive enough for single-player games, and it does all of that in the mid-range tier rather than the premium one.

Best Budget: Dell 24 240Hz (SE2426HG)

At 23.8 inches and 1080p with an IPS panel running at 240 Hz, this is the cheapest credible route into genuinely high-refresh gaming. The low resolution is an advantage here — it is far easier for a modest graphics card to feed 240 frames per second at 1080p than at 1440p, so you actually see the refresh rate you paid for.

Best Premium: Samsung 27″ Odyssey OLED G6 (G61SH)

QD-OLED changes what a monitor can do: per-pixel dimming, effectively unlimited contrast, and pixel response measured in hundredths of a millisecond. The G61SH packages that in a 27-inch QHD frame at a very high refresh rate, making it the pick for anyone who wants the best-looking image and is willing to manage static-interface habits to protect the panel.

Quick Comparison

Every product in this guide, sorted by what it is actually good at. Price tiers are relative bands within the gaming monitor market, not fixed figures — Black Friday pricing moves daily, so treat the tier as the stable part of the equation.

How We Chose

This guide is built from published specification sheets, brand documentation and category knowledge — not from testing units. Every claim about a monitor here traces back to what the manufacturer lists (resolution, refresh rate, curvature, adaptive sync standard, panel technology, port count) or to well-established behaviour of that spec class, such as how a VA panel’s contrast compares with an IPS panel’s viewing angles, or how pixel density changes with diagonal size.

The shortlist was filtered on four criteria. First, spec completeness: a monitor had to state its resolution, refresh rate and adaptive sync support, because a discount on an unstated spec is not a discount at all. Second, category fit: the list needed a genuine budget entry, a genuine mid-range workhorse and a genuine premium option so that no reader is forced upward. Third, use-case spread: 1080p esports, 1440p all-round, ultrawide immersion and OLED image quality are different jobs, and a list of nine near-identical 27-inch panels would serve nobody. Fourth, upgrade path: we favoured monitors that still make sense three to five years out — 1440p rather than 1080p for larger panels, adaptive sync with low framerate compensation, and VESA mounting so the display can outlive its stand. Where a listing leaves something ambiguous, we say so rather than filling the gap with a guess.

1. Samsung 32″ Odyssey (G55C) – Best for Big-Screen QHD Value

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

#1 Pick

Samsung 32" Odyssey (G55C) Series QHD 1000R Curved Gaming Monitor,

Check Price on Amazon →

The G55C is the monitor to shortlist if you want one screen that does a bit of everything. It is a 32-inch QHD curved display running at 165 Hz with FreeSync Premium and HDR10 — fast enough for ranked shooters, large enough to double as a console display, and curved enough to feel enveloping without dominating a room. It suits PC gamers with a mid-range or better graphics card, Xbox Series X and PS5 owners who want 1440p at high frame rates, and anyone stepping up from a 24-inch 1080p panel who wants the upgrade to be obvious. It is the wrong choice for a shallow desk, a hard budget ceiling, or anyone chasing true HDR.

Key specs

• Screen size: 32 inches, 16:9 aspect ratio
• Resolution: QHD, 2560 x 1440
• Refresh rate: 165 Hz
• Response time: 1 ms MPRT as listed
• Curvature: 1000R
• Panel class: VA-type LCD — high native contrast, deeper blacks, narrower viewing angles than IPS
• Adaptive sync: AMD FreeSync Premium, which includes low framerate compensation
• HDR: HDR10 support (tone mapping, not full-array local dimming)
• Inputs: DisplayPort plus dual HDMI, with a headphone output
• Mounting: VESA-compatible for arm or wall mounting

The most useful number here is not the refresh rate — it is the pixel density. A 32-inch 2560 x 1440 panel works out to roughly 92 pixels per inch, which is almost exactly the same as a standard 24-inch 1080p monitor at about 93 PPI. In practice that means text, UI elements and fine detail look just as crisp as they do on the 24-inch screen most people are upgrading from, but spread across a canvas with about 78 percent more surface area. You are not trading sharpness for size. That is the entire argument for 1440p at 32 inches, and it is why 1080p at this size — about 69 PPI — is a downgrade in everything but price.

The second number worth understanding is 1000R. That figure is the radius of the curve in millimetres, so a 1000R panel describes an arc with a 1-metre radius. Sit about a metre from the screen and the left and right edges are the same distance from your eyes as the centre, which keeps the whole image in focus and slightly increases the sense of immersion. Sit much closer and the effect is stronger but the geometry starts to feel aggressive; sit much farther back and the curve becomes decorative. For a 32-inch panel, roughly 80 to 100 cm of viewing distance is the natural home.

FreeSync Premium is the spec to check rather than plain FreeSync. Premium guarantees low framerate compensation, which means that when your frame rate dips below the panel’s minimum VRR window — commonly around 48 Hz — the monitor duplicates frames to keep variable refresh active instead of dropping out and letting you feel a stutter. On a 165 Hz panel that matters in demanding single-player games far more than in esports titles, where you rarely drop that low. The HDR10 label deserves a caveat: without local dimming zones, HDR here mostly means the monitor accepts an HDR signal and tone maps it. It is not the same experience as a display with hundreds of dimming zones or per-pixel lighting, and you should not pay a premium for it.

Pros

• 32-inch QHD delivers roughly the same pixel density as a 24-inch 1080p monitor, so text stays sharp despite the larger canvas
• 165 Hz with FreeSync Premium and low framerate compensation keeps motion smooth across a wide frame-rate range
• 1000R curvature suits a one-metre viewing distance and adds immersion in racing, sim and open-world games
• Dual HDMI plus DisplayPort makes it easy to share between a PC and a console without swapping cables
• VESA mounting support means the display can move to an arm or wall later, extending its useful life

Cons

• VA-type panels can show dark-level smearing in fast-moving shadow detail, which is noticeable in horror games and night maps
• HDR10 without local dimming is entry-level HDR at best — treat it as a compatibility feature, not a picture-quality upgrade
• 32 inches demands real desk depth; on a shallow desk you will be rotating your head to see the corners
• Viewing angles are narrower than IPS, so it is a poor choice for a couch or a shared-screen setup

How it compares

The nearest alternative in this list is the LG 32GS60QC-B Ultragear, which matches the size, resolution and 1000R curvature but steps the refresh rate up to 180 Hz and adds HDR10 with FreeSync. On paper the LG has the edge in refresh headroom — 15 Hz is a real but modest gain, roughly nine percent more frames displayed per second at the ceiling. The G55C’s counterargument is maturity: it is a long-established model with a deep install base, which tends to mean better-documented firmware behaviour and more community knowledge about settings. If you want the absolute highest refresh at 32 inches QHD in the mid-range tier, the LG wins narrowly. If you want the safest, best-understood 32-inch QHD purchase, the Samsung does.

2. Sceptre 22-Inch Gaming Monitor – Best for the Lowest-Cost Entry

#2 Pick

Sceptre New 22-Inch Gaming Monitor, FHD 1080p, Up to 144Hz, HDMI, DisplayPort, Built-in Speakers, Machine Black (E225W-FW144 Series, 2026)

Check Price on Amazon →

This is the monitor you buy when the goal is to spend as little as possible and still get a real gaming display. At roughly 21.5 inches with a 1920 x 1080 panel running at up to 144 Hz, with HDMI and DisplayPort inputs and built-in speakers, it covers the basics without extras. It suits a first build on a strict budget, a dorm or bedroom desk where space is tight, a secondary screen for chat and streaming tools, or a parent buying a first gaming setup for a teenager. It does not suit anyone chasing image quality, HDR or a large immersive picture.

Key specs

• Screen size: 22-inch class (approximately 21.5 inches diagonal)
• Resolution: Full HD, 1920 x 1080
• Refresh rate: up to 144 Hz
• Inputs: HDMI and DisplayPort
• Audio: built-in speakers
• Finish: machine black
• Adaptive sync: not named in the listing — treat variable refresh support as unconfirmed until you check the full spec sheet

The strongest technical argument for this monitor is pixel density. At 21.5 inches, a 1080p panel works out to roughly 103 pixels per inch — higher than a 24-inch 1080p screen at about 93 PPI and higher than a 27-inch 1440p screen at about 109 PPI’s smaller sibling. Practically, that means desktop text and fine UI detail look genuinely sharp, sharper than on most larger budget monitors. The trade-off is physical: a 21.5-inch 16:9 screen is only about 48 cm wide, so you are working in a small window. For a single-window game that is fine. For a spreadsheet plus a browser plus a chat client, it is cramped.

144 Hz is the other meaningful spec. The jump from 60 Hz to 144 Hz is the single most noticeable upgrade in PC gaming — motion becomes legible, tracking targets gets easier, and the whole desktop feels more responsive. The jump from 144 Hz to 240 Hz is real but much smaller, which is why a cheap 144 Hz panel is often a smarter budget buy than a slightly more expensive 240 Hz one if the money has to come from somewhere. Pairing this monitor with a modest graphics card is also sensible: 1080p at 144 Hz is achievable on hardware that would struggle to hold 60 frames at 1440p.

The built-in speakers are a genuine convenience for a first setup, though they are best treated as a fallback for system sounds and voice chat rather than a substitute for headphones or a small speaker pair. The absence of a stated adaptive sync standard is worth flagging honestly: the listing names the resolution, the refresh rate and the ports but does not call out FreeSync or G-Sync compatibility. Some panels in this tier support VRR unofficially, but you should not budget for it. If variable refresh is a must-have for you, step up to a model that states its adaptive sync standard explicitly.

Pros

• The lowest entry cost in this guide while still delivering a genuine 144 Hz gaming panel
• Roughly 103 PPI at 21.5 inches means desktop text looks sharper than on most budget 24-inch screens
• Small footprint fits shallow desks, dorm rooms and cramped apartments
• Both HDMI and DisplayPort inputs, so it works with a PC and a console without adapters
• Built-in speakers remove the need to buy separate audio on day one

Cons

• 21.5 inches is small for immersive single-player games and tight for multitasking
• Adaptive sync support is not stated in the listing, so variable refresh cannot be assumed
• No HDR claim and no premium panel technology — this is a fundamentals-only display
• Stand ergonomics at this price tier are typically limited, so plan on a VESA arm if you need height adjustment

How it compares

The nearest alternative is the Sceptre 24-Inch Prime, which costs more but gives you 24 inches and a 165 Hz refresh rate across two DisplayPort and two HDMI inputs. That is a meaningful step: 24 inches is the classic 1080p size, with roughly 92 PPI, and 165 Hz over four total inputs makes multi-device switching far easier. The 22-inch model’s case is pure price and space. If your desk is narrow or your budget is the hard constraint, the smaller screen is the right call. If you can stretch, the 24-inch Prime is the better long-term purchase because it sits at the size most 1080p content and UI is designed for.

3. Sceptre Curved 27-Inch Prime – Best for Cheap Curved 180 Hz Gaming

#3 Pick

New! Sceptre Curved 27-inch Prime Gaming Monitor DisplayPort x2 180Hz HDMI x2 180Hz 1500R 1ms Build-in Speakers, Machine Black 2027 (C275B-FW180T Series)

Check Price on Amazon →

This is the value play for anyone who wants the curved 27-inch look and a high refresh rate without paying mid-range prices. The listing names a 1500R curve, 180 Hz over two DisplayPort and two HDMI inputs, a 1 ms response time and built-in speakers. It suits a PC gamer with a modest graphics card who wants a bigger, more immersive screen than a 24-inch flat panel, and it suits anyone who values having four video inputs so a PC, a console and a laptop can all stay plugged in. It does not suit someone who needs confirmed 1440p sharpness or verified adaptive sync.

Key specs

• Screen size: 27 inches
• Curvature: 1500R
• Refresh rate: 180 Hz over DisplayPort and over HDMI
• Response time: 1 ms as listed
• Inputs: 2x DisplayPort, 2x HDMI
• Audio: built-in speakers
• Resolution: not stated in the product name — 27-inch curved 180 Hz panels in this tier are commonly 1920 x 1080, so confirm the native resolution on the full spec sheet before buying

The resolution ambiguity is the single most important thing to resolve before you buy, and it is worth being blunt about why. At 27 inches, 1080p works out to roughly 82 pixels per inch. That is noticeably softer than a 24-inch 1080p panel at about 93 PPI and well behind a 27-inch 1440p panel at about 109 PPI. Text edges look slightly fuzzy, fine UI elements lose definition, and you will notice it most in strategy games, spreadsheets and web browsing rather than in fast action. If the native resolution turns out to be 1440p, this monitor becomes a genuinely strong deal. If it is 1080p, you are trading sharpness for size and refresh rate — a trade plenty of gamers happily make, but one you should make knowingly.

The 1500R curve is gentler than the 1000R panels elsewhere in this guide, which is generally the right call at 27 inches. A 1500R arc has a 1.5-metre radius, so the ideal viewing distance is around 1.5 metres — farther than most people sit. In practice, a 1500R curve at 27 inches reads as a subtle wrap rather than a dramatic one: it adds a little immersion and slightly reduces the perceived distance to the edges, without distorting straight lines as aggressively as a tighter curve. For a 27-inch panel at a typical 70 to 90 cm viewing distance, that restraint is usually welcome.

Four inputs is an unusual amount of connectivity at this price tier and it is genuinely useful. Two DisplayPort and two HDMI means you can leave a desktop PC, a gaming laptop and a console connected simultaneously and switch sources from the monitor menu instead of crawling behind the desk. The listed 180 Hz over both connection types is also notable — some budget monitors cap HDMI at 120 Hz or 144 Hz and reserve the full refresh rate for DisplayPort, which forces a compromise if your console is the primary source. Confirm the HDMI version, though, since older HDMI revisions can limit high refresh at higher resolutions.

Pros

• 180 Hz is high refresh rate headroom at a price tier where 144 Hz is still common
• Four video inputs — 2x DisplayPort and 2x HDMI — make multi-device setups easy without cable swapping
• 1500R curvature is a sensible match for 27 inches, adding immersion without distorting the image
• Built-in speakers cover system audio and voice chat on a first setup
• 1 ms response as listed keeps motion blur low for the class

Cons

• Native resolution is not stated in the product name, so sharpness cannot be assumed — verify before buying
• Adaptive sync is not named in the listing, which is a real gap at 180 Hz where frame-rate mismatch is most visible
• Curved panels in this tier are typically VA-type, so expect narrower viewing angles than IPS
• 27 inches at 1080p is a visible step down in text crispness versus 24 inches at 1080p

How it compares

Compared with the Sceptre 24-Inch Prime, you are buying three inches of diagonal, a curve and 15 Hz more refresh for a modest premium. That is a reasonable trade if you sit close and want the screen to fill more of your view. Compared with the Dell SE2426HG, the trade runs the other way: the Dell gives up size and curvature but delivers a stated IPS panel and 240 Hz, which is a better competitive-gaming proposition and a safer bet on picture consistency. If your priority is esports frames, the Dell is the stronger choice. If your priority is a big, curved, immersive-feeling screen for the least money, this Sceptre is the one.

4. Alienware AW3425DWM – Best for Immersive Ultrawide Play

#4 Pick

Alienware 34 Curved Gaming Monitor – AW3425DWM – 34-inch WQHD 180Hz 1ms Display, 1500R, AMD FreeSync Premium, VESA AdaptiveSync.

Check Price on Amazon →

The AW3425DWM is the ultrawide entry in this list, and it is aimed at a specific kind of player: someone who wants the screen to disappear at the edges and the game to fill their vision. It is a 34-inch WQHD 3440 x 1440 curved display at 180 Hz with a 1 ms response time, 1500R curvature and AMD FreeSync Premium. It suits sim racers, flight and space sim players, open-world gamers, and anyone who wants a single screen that handles both gaming and a wide productivity workspace. It does not suit competitive shooters where a smaller, faster panel wins, or console-first players, since ultrawide aspect ratios are not supported by modern consoles.

Key specs

• Screen size: 34 inches, 21:9 ultrawide
• Resolution: WQHD, 3440 x 1440
• Refresh rate: 180 Hz
• Response time: 1 ms as listed
• Curvature: 1500R
• Adaptive sync: AMD FreeSync Premium, which includes low framerate compensation
• Panel class: curved LCD — ultrawide panels in this tier typically use VA-type technology, favouring contrast over viewing angles
• Mounting: VESA-compatible

The numbers that matter here are the horizontal ones. A 3440 x 1440 panel has about 34 percent more pixels than a standard 2560 x 1440 display, arranged sideways rather than upward. In games with proper ultrawide support, that means you see more of the world to your left and right — extra peripheral vision in a racing sim, more of the track ahead, a wider field of view in a shooter without changing your aim sensitivity. In practice, ultrawide support is now the norm in modern releases, but older titles and a handful of competitive shooters still letterbox the image with black bars, which reduces your effective screen to a standard 27-inch 16:9 area in the middle.

Pixel density is the quiet strength. At 34 inches, 3440 x 1440 works out to roughly 110 pixels per inch — essentially the same as a 27-inch 1440p monitor, which is the sharpest mainstream desktop combination. So despite the ultrawide canvas being physically large, text and fine detail stay crisp. That is why ultrawides are popular with people who game and work on the same machine: you get a 21:9 workspace for side-by-side windows during the day and a wide field of view at night, without giving up sharpness.

FreeSync Premium at 180 Hz is a good pairing for this resolution. Driving 3440 x 1440 at 180 frames per second takes a serious graphics card in demanding titles, so low framerate compensation matters — it keeps variable refresh active when your frame rate drops into the 50s or 60s, which it will in heavy scenes. The 1500R curve is well matched to a 34-inch ultrawide, since the panel is wide enough that a flat version would put the far corners at an awkward angle. Plan on a desk that is at least 120 cm wide and 70 cm deep: the monitor itself is roughly 80 cm across, and you want your eyes about 70 to 90 cm from the centre.

Pros

• 3440 x 1440 at 34 inches delivers roughly 110 PPI, matching the sharpness of a 27-inch 1440p panel
• 21:9 aspect ratio adds peripheral vision in supported games and makes side-by-side productivity work practical
• 180 Hz with FreeSync Premium and low framerate compensation covers a wide range of frame rates
• 1500R curvature is well proportioned to a panel this wide, keeping the corners at a usable angle
• Alienware’s gaming line is a long-established premium brand, which typically means better documented firmware and support

Cons

• Ultrawide aspect ratios are not supported by current consoles, so this is a PC-only purchase
• Some competitive shooters and older titles letterbox the image, wasting the extra width
• Driving 3440 x 1440 at 180 Hz requires a strong graphics card to be worthwhile
• Curved LCD panels in this tier usually have narrower viewing angles than IPS, and the physical size needs a wide desk
• Premium tier pricing means you are paying for the format as much as the panel

How it compares

The nearest alternative is the Sceptre Curved 34-Inch Prime, which also runs 3440 x 1440 at 1500R but pushes the refresh rate up to 240 Hz and lists 100% sRGB coverage, at a premium tier that undercuts typical ultrawide pricing. On refresh rate alone, the Sceptre has the higher ceiling. The Alienware’s case rests on the adaptive sync standard it names explicitly — FreeSync Premium with low framerate compensation — and on brand maturity in the premium gaming segment. If you want the highest possible refresh rate on an ultrawide and are comfortable confirming the rest of the spec sheet yourself, the Sceptre is the value pick. If you want the safer, better-supported premium ultrawide with documented VRR behaviour, the Alienware is the one to buy.

5. Samsung 27″ Odyssey OLED G6 (G61SH) – Best for OLED Image Quality

#5 Pick

Samsung 27" Odyssey OLED G6 (G61SH) QD-OLED, QHD (1440P) Gaming Monitor

Check Price on Amazon →

The G61SH is the picture-quality answer in this guide. It pairs a QD-OLED panel with QHD resolution in a 27-inch frame at a very high refresh rate, and it exists for people who care more about how a game looks than about how much it costs. It suits single-player players who want deep blacks and saturated colour, competitive players who want the fastest possible pixel response, and anyone building a premium setup around a 27-inch desk footprint. It does not suit someone who leaves a static interface on screen for eight hours a day, or anyone who wants the largest possible screen for the money.

Key specs

• Screen size: 27 inches, 16:9
• Panel technology: QD-OLED (quantum-dot OLED), with per-pixel self-illumination
• Resolution: QHD, 2560 x 1440 — roughly 109 PPI at this size
• Refresh rate: very high for the QHD OLED class, in the 240 Hz-and-above range across the Odyssey OLED G6 family
• Response time: OLED-class, measured in hundredths of a millisecond rather than whole milliseconds
• Contrast: effectively unlimited, since each pixel turns off completely for black
• HDR: OLED-class HDR with per-pixel dimming, which is a fundamentally different proposition from edge-lit HDR
• Adaptive sync: high-refresh VRR support typical of this class

Understanding what OLED changes is the whole point of this monitor. On an LCD, the backlight is always on, and a “black” pixel is really a liquid crystal shutter blocking most of that light. On an OLED, each pixel emits its own light, so a black pixel is genuinely off. The result is contrast that no LCD can approach, no blooming around bright objects on dark backgrounds, and HDR that actually looks like HDR because the highlights and the shadows are controlled independently. If you have only ever used LCD monitors, this is the difference you notice in the first thirty seconds of a dark game.

Response time is the second differentiator. LCD panels quote figures like 1 ms, but that number usually describes a best-case transition or a motion-picture-response measurement rather than the worst-case grey-to-grey time. OLED pixels switch in hundredths of a millisecond, which means motion clarity is essentially limited by the refresh rate and by your own eye tracking rather than by the panel. Fast panning shots in shooters and racing games stay legible in a way that even the best LCDs struggle to match. Combine that with a very high refresh rate and you have the lowest-motion-blur combination available in a consumer monitor.

The honest caveats are equally important. OLED panels can suffer permanent image retention — burn-in — when the same static element, such as a health bar, minimap or taskbar, sits in the same place for hundreds of hours. Modern panels include mitigations like pixel shifting, logo dimming and periodic compensation cycles, and the risk is far lower than it was a decade ago, but it is not zero. Good habits help: hide the taskbar, use a screensaver, vary your content, and let the monitor run its compensation cycle when it prompts you. QD-OLED also uses a triangular subpixel layout that some people find produces slight colour fringing on small text, which is worth checking if you read a lot of dense documents. Finally, full-screen white content is not as bright as a good LCD, because OLED brightness is limited by power and by the need to protect the organic material.

Pros

• Per-pixel dimming delivers effectively unlimited contrast, so dark scenes look genuinely dark with no blooming
• OLED-class response times produce the lowest motion blur available in a consumer gaming monitor
• Very high refresh rate in the QHD OLED class pairs with the fast pixels to keep fast motion legible
• QHD at 27 inches works out to roughly 109 PPI, the sharpest mainstream desktop combination
• 27-inch footprint fits a standard desk without the depth demands of a 32-inch or ultrawide panel

Cons

• Image retention risk means static HUDs, taskbars and desktop icons need managing over the panel’s life
• Premium tier pricing puts it well above the mid-range LCD options in this guide
• Full-screen bright content does not reach the peak brightness of a good LCD, since OLED brightness is power-limited
• QD-OLED subpixel layout can produce slight colour fringing on fine text for some viewers

How it compares

The nearest alternative is the Alienware AW3425DWM, and the choice comes down to format versus technology. The Alienware gives you a 34-inch 21:9 canvas with about 34 percent more pixels, better for sim racing, wide-field shooters and side-by-side productivity. The Samsung gives you OLED contrast, OLED response and per-pixel HDR in a smaller 27-inch 16:9 frame. If your priority is immersion through sheer screen area, the ultrawide wins. If your priority is the best image the panel can produce — deep blacks, no blooming, near-instant pixel transitions — the OLED wins, and it wins by a wide margin. Many premium buyers eventually want both, but if you can only pick one, decide whether you are buying screen real estate or picture quality.

6. LG 32GS60QC-B Ultragear – Best for 32-Inch QHD at 180 Hz

#6 Pick

LG 32GS60QC-B Ultragear 32-inch Curved Gaming Monitor QHD (2560×1440) 180Hz 1ms 1000R AMD FreeSync HDR10 HDMIx2 DisplayPort Borderless Design Black Stabilizer DAS Crosshair FPS Counter – Black

Check Price on Amazon →

The 32GS60QC-B is LG’s take on the same brief as the Samsung G55C, and it takes the refresh rate one step further. It is a 32-inch QHD curved panel at 180 Hz with a 1 ms response time, 1000R curvature, AMD FreeSync, HDR10 and a mix of HDMI and DisplayPort inputs. It suits a PC gamer with a mid-range graphics card who wants the largest sensible 1440p canvas, and it suits anyone who wants the highest refresh rate available at 32 inches QHD without moving into OLED pricing. It is not the pick for a shallow desk, a tight budget or a true-HDR setup.

Key specs

• Screen size: 32 inches, 16:9
• Resolution: QHD, 2560 x 1440 — roughly 92 PPI at this size
• Refresh rate: 180 Hz
• Response time: 1 ms as listed
• Curvature: 1000R
• Adaptive sync: AMD FreeSync
• HDR: HDR10 support
• Inputs: dual HDMI plus DisplayPort
• Panel class: curved LCD, VA-type in this tier — high contrast with narrower viewing angles

At 180 Hz, this panel sits 15 Hz above the 165 Hz tier that dominates mid-range 32-inch QHD. That is about nine percent more frames displayed per second at the ceiling, which is a small but real difference: the higher the ceiling, the more headroom you have before frame pacing becomes the limiting factor, and the less time each frame spends on screen, which reduces perceived motion blur. In practice, 165 Hz to 180 Hz is not the kind of upgrade you notice in isolation. It matters as a tiebreaker between two otherwise similar monitors, which is exactly the situation this guide creates between the LG and the Samsung G55C.

The 32-inch QHD pixel density argument